A Quantitative Approach for Evaluating the Impact of Side-by-Side Management

Case Study

In this case study we explore how traditional transaction cost analysis (TCA) models using alternative benchmarks can accurately identify trades that appear to benefit one account or fund over another. We’ll also demonstrate how Sentry – our post-trade compliance solution – enables global investment management firms to establish a systematic, quantifiable, and repeatable process for evaluating side-by-side management conflicts.

Regulatory Background

Advisers are required to adopt policies and procedures designed to ensure that all funds are treated fairly and equitably over time, regardless of investment strategy, legal or fee structure. This is enforced in The United States under Rule 206(4)-7 of the Advisers Act and in the United Kingdom under Principle 3 and Principle 8 of the FCA’s Principles of Businesses, which require an investment adviser to manage conflicts of interest fairly between itself and its customers, and between customers and other clients.

Results

Using Sentry, the Adviser has conducted account impact analysis for four consecutive years. Their monthly review validates that all accounts are trading on average within 20 basis points of their peer account, regardless of strategy or legal structure. Using data filters, the Adviser is also able to more closely monitor affiliated and proprietary accounts to ensure that no preferential treatment of these accounts exists. Each time trade impacts are identified that contribute substantially to account impact ratios, the Adviser validates that orders were handled in accordance with aggregation and sequencing policies and that no conflicts of interest influenced the execution or allocation decision.

Want to read more?

Fill in the form below to download the full case study.

Loading form...

Latest Content

SEC Proposes Amendments to Advertising Rules

In a proposal that would mark the first changes since 1961, the SEC has introduced amendments to modify the “Advertisements by Investment Advisers” Rule 206(4)-1 of the Investment Advisers Act. Changes to the rule would allow for testimonials and social media practices beyond that currently allowed, and performance marketing subject to new requirements. Some parts … Continued

Roadmap to Conducting Annual Compliance Reviews

The “annual” in annual review is a misnomer! That was one of the key takeaways from a session conducted at the recent 2019 NSCP National Conference that featured practical and timely tips to consider when planning and undertaking an annual review for an investment adviser or mutual fund. Panelists Tracy Abbott, CCO of Seavest Investment … Continued

Technology Advances Here and On the Way for Form CRS

CSS featured a strong presence at the recent 2019 BAM + Loring Ward Advisor National Conference in St. Louis, Mo. The conference, titled “In Our Element,” explored the chemistry of investment advisors’ relationships with their clients and the keys to successfully building those relationships. Within that context, CSS’s compliance presentation outlining the purpose and implementation … Continued