A Year On: Transaction cost reporting under PRIIPS and MiFID II

In the runup to 1 January 2018, financial firms the world over rushed to select service providers for the various tools required to comply with PRIIPS and MiFID II. Decisions were not necessarily made with validation that the products, vendors or data sources they had selected were indeed best-suited to the firm’s needs, but rather with the goal of ensuring that the selected solution allowed the firm to “check the boxes” related to the RTS.

A year on, firms are rethinking some of those decisions. While many of their selections will be fine for the time being, others turned out to be underwhelming, if not altogether vaporware. Still others were Band-Aid decisions that were suitable for the immediate need, but not the long term. Transaction cost calculations are proving to be a notably affected area, with a surprising number of clients rethinking their product selection, particularly as costs and charges transparency and regulatory audits make headlines.

Want to read more?

Fill in the form below to download the full whitepaper.

Loading form...

Latest Content

Regulation Best Interest, Cybersecurity Top Concerns at IAA 2019 Compliance Conference

The Investment Adviser Association (IAA) represents the interests of investment advisers in Washington D.C., and the IAA Investment Adviser Compliance Conference 2019 was a forum for the discussion of future potential rulemaking. Cybersecurity and Fiduciary Rule considerations were headline topics, with custody and marketing right behind. The following is a summary of key issues discussed … Continued

Cybersecurity Drives SEC to Modify Timing of Form N-PORT Filings

The SEC announced on Wednesday, Feb. 27 that it approved an interim final rule amending the timing requirements for filing Form N-PORT. Reports will now be prepared monthly but submitted to the SEC quarterly. In addition, the deadline to submit the reports has been changed from 30 days to 60 days. In a release announcing … Continued