A Year On: Transaction cost reporting under PRIIPS and MiFID II

In the runup to 1 January 2018, financial firms the world over rushed to select service providers for the various tools required to comply with PRIIPS and MiFID II. Decisions were not necessarily made with validation that the products, vendors or data sources they had selected were indeed best-suited to the firm’s needs, but rather with the goal of ensuring that the selected solution allowed the firm to “check the boxes” related to the RTS.

A year on, firms are rethinking some of those decisions. While many of their selections will be fine for the time being, others turned out to be underwhelming, if not altogether vaporware. Still others were Band-Aid decisions that were suitable for the immediate need, but not the long term. Transaction cost calculations are proving to be a notably affected area, with a surprising number of clients rethinking their product selection, particularly as costs and charges transparency and regulatory audits make headlines.

Want to read more?

Fill in the form below to download the full whitepaper.

Loading form...

Latest Content

How Can a Small Advisory Practice Economically Be as Cyber-Secure as Possible?

Cybersecurity is a risk that applies to firms both large and small without discrimination. Even very small advisory firms, which I’ll define as having one to five staff for purposes of this discussion, have a wealth of information worth safeguarding. Cybercrime is often a crime of opportunity. Hackers are metaphorically going door to door (computer … Continued

Will We See Liquidity Risk Management Programs in Europe Soon?

In an article posted by Ignites Europe, the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) in Luxembourg declared that it has “stepped up its supervisory focus on the liquidity aspects that are related to the recent developments” of Neil Woodford’s flagship fund and H2O Asset Management, an affiliate of Natixis Asset Management. In the U.S., … Continued