Compliance Points for Insider Trading, MNPI

The news headlines continue to be filled with insider trading scandals. Insider trading is based on a simple, well-established principle: if you receive material, nonpublic information about a public company from any source, you are prohibited from discussing or acting on that information.

Under the Advisers Act, the SEC may sue any person (or any person who controls or supervises such person) who trades while in possession of “material, nonpublic information” or who communicates or “tips” such information. Trading the securities of any company while in possession of material, nonpublic information about that company is generally prohibited by the securities laws of the United States and firm policy. Under insider trading laws, a person or company that illegally trades in securities of a company while in possession of material, nonpublic information about that company may be subject to severe sanctions, including civil penalties, fines and imprisonment.

Please refer to your Code of Ethics and Compliance Policies and Procedures Manual, along with the SEC for additional information on who is an insider and what is considered material, nonpublic information.

Here are some ways to identify sources of insider information:

  • Employees must report all business, financial or personal relationships that may result in access to material, nonpublic information;
  • The CCO should review all reportable personal investment activity for Supervised Persons and related accounts;
  • The CCO should periodically review firm trading activity (e.g., trade blotter review); and
  • The CCO should prepare a written report to management and/or legal counsel, as necessary, of any possible violation of the firm’s Insider Trading Policy for the purpose of implementing corrective and/or disciplinary action.

During routine e-mail surveillance, review communications to identify any wrongdoing or sharing of non-public information. In addition, conduct a review of the Firm’s trade blotter and document any anomalies in clients’ trading.

SEC enforcement actions demonstrate that persons with no intention of receiving MNPI may have relationships with the potential to lead to the sharing of MNPI, and that some persons attempt to take advantage of the information. A cursory search of “insider trading” results will include recent cases in which accountants, investor relations personnel, auditors, and investment representatives have shared MNPI.

Insider Trading Compliance Points:
  1. Your Code of Ethics may require reporting of Supervised Persons’ positions on the board of directors of a public company or other governing board of a public company. Such service with a public company could subject a person to inside information and therefore restrict such employee’s ability to trade such security or securities.
  2. The compliance reporting requirement and compliance reviews of personal securities transactions are, in part, designed to detect personal trading based on inside information.
  3. The portfolio holdings of client accounts and trading activity within such accounts are considered inside information by the Firm.
  4. Supervised Persons should be aware that inside information about public companies may be acquired from a broad range of sources, potentially including clients, accounting-firm clients or brokers with which the firm conducts securities activities. Supervised persons should be cognizant that it should not act on any third-party information that it believes may be inside information regardless of the source of such information.

Compliance Training Tip: Now is a great time to provide employees with additional training on what constitutes insider trading and the potential repercussions of acting on such information. Even an email communication to employees highlighting this section of the Code of Ethics can bring awareness of the topic to the forefront. We have also provided a link to download a ComplianceCast presentation on the topic of insider trading that you might find helpful.


Subscribe to CSS Blog

CSS frequently publishes blog posts which are written by our team from their observations in the field, at conferences and through experiences with compliance professionals. These posts are designed to further knowledge and share industry best practices. Topics run the gamut, including Form ADV, cybersecurity, MiFID II, position limit monitoring, technology challenges and more. Complete and submit the brief form below to receive notifications when we publish new content.

Loading form...

Latest Content

How Can a Small Advisory Practice Economically Be as Cyber-Secure as Possible?

Cybersecurity is a risk that applies to firms both large and small without discrimination. Even very small advisory firms, which I’ll define as having one to five staff for purposes of this discussion, have a wealth of information worth safeguarding. Cybercrime is often a crime of opportunity. Hackers are metaphorically going door to door (computer … Continued

Will We See Liquidity Risk Management Programs in Europe Soon?

In an article posted by Ignites Europe, the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) in Luxembourg declared that it has “stepped up its supervisory focus on the liquidity aspects that are related to the recent developments” of Neil Woodford’s flagship fund and H2O Asset Management, an affiliate of Natixis Asset Management. In the U.S., … Continued