The Impact on Thousands of Advisory Firms
Ways an Adviser May Inadvertently Have Custody
Practical Implications
Next Steps
More Surprise Examinations: Client Communications and Agreements
This ComplianceCast will address the complex Custody topic, tackling practical implications of what circumstances now will constitute custody. New coverage of the following:
- SLOAs (authority to transfer client money to a third party)
- First Person Transfers (authority to transfer money to the same client)
- Custodial Agreement Provisions with Advisory Clients (which impute advisers with custody)
- Avoid Inadvertent Custody with Written Consent
Analyzing Recent SEC Guidance:
- Investment Adviser Association No-Action Letter, February 21, 2017
- IM Guidance Update February 2017, “Inadvertent Custody: Advisory Contract versus Custodial Contract Authority.”
- FAQs, prior no-action letters
Next steps: Good-faith effort and timing; adapting policies and procedures, written consent and IMAs.
Bonus coverage of more industry questions.
Panelists:
Christopher Gilkerson, SVP & General Counsel, Charles Schwab & Co.
Laura L. Grossman, Assistant General Counsel, Investment Adviser Association
Robert E. Plaze, Partner, Proskauer
Jacqueline Hallihan, Partner, Ascendant Compliance Management
Fill in & submit the form below to download this ComplianceCast™
Subscribe to CSS Blog
CSS frequently publishes blog posts which are written by our team from their observations in the field, at conferences and through experiences with compliance professionals. These posts are designed to further knowledge and share industry best practices. Topics run the gamut, including Form ADV, cybersecurity, MiFID II, position limit monitoring, technology challenges and more. Complete and submit the brief form below to receive notifications when we publish new content.
