It Takes a Village – Preparing for a Regulatory Exam

Advanced planning for a regulatory exam remains a vital step in ensuring the compliance team is prepared when the exam teams comes knocking. At the recent CSS/Ascendant fall conference in San Diego, Allison Fraser moderated the conference’s capstone session on the topic, joined by Bryan Bennett, the Associate Regional Director in the examination program in the SEC’s Los Angeles regional office; Asher Ailey, Chief Legal Officer and Head of Compliance at Research Affiliates, LLC; and Genna Garver, Of Counsel and Chair of the Investment Management Group at Dorsey & Whitney LLP.

During the session, Bennett provided the audience with a background of the exam program, how the increased use of data analytics has changed the exam staff’s approach, the practice of hiring examiners with industry background, and the role of the Private Funds Unit and interaction with the regional offices.

Ailey highlighted some key steps an adviser should undertake on an ongoing basis to ensure the effectiveness of a compliance program, including periodic risk assessments, ensuring that Form ADV and other filings are current and accurate, and conducting regular employee training. Ailey also recommends conducting a mock exam to gain an independent view of the firm’s compliance program. Garver noted that the exercise of producing documents requested in a mock exam informs the firm about its ability to respond to an actual exam.

Garver highlights the importance of advanced planning of the logistics of the exam, such as designating your exam team, identifying your process for producing and tracking documents and preparing an opening presentation to provide the background of the business to the exam staff. The panel also offered these additional suggestions:

  • Provide complete and accurate answers to any request or question. Be sure to ask questions if you don’t understand, and be specific as to your responses
  • Be timely in your responses and communicate promptly with the staff if you identify delays in producing documents
  • Make your senior personnel available during the on-site exam
  • Have someone, preferably the CCO, sit in during all interviews with firm personnel
  • Be professional and accommodating
  • Don’t do a data dump
  • Be careful about overly broad privilege claims
  • Keep calm

The panel noted that most exams end in some type of deficiency finding. For each finding, identify the necessary corrective action and advise the staff of your plan. Ensure that corrective measures are completed. While an exam is stressful on an organization, effective efforts before, during and after an exam can help minimize the impact on your firm.


CSS’ investment adviser solutions include SEC mock exams. For more information, contact us.


Subscribe to CSS Blog

CSS frequently publishes blog posts which are written by our team from their observations in the field, at conferences and through experiences with compliance professionals. These posts are designed to further knowledge and share industry best practices. Topics run the gamut, including Form ADV, cybersecurity, MiFID II, position limit monitoring, technology challenges and more. Complete and submit the brief form below to receive notifications when we publish new content.

Latest Content

Do You Feel Confident Your Password Hasn’t Been Hacked?

As a cybersecurity consultant, I am often asked if some of the threats we industry practitioners talk about are overstated. Hyped up fear as a sales tactic. The simple answer is no. The fear is not overstated, and the risks all too real – which helps to explain why cyber remains a top priority for … Continued

SEC’s New Committee Begins Review of Form CRS Filings

The SEC’s Divisional Standards of Conduct Implementation Committee launched its review of Form CRS from a cross section of RIAs and BDs to assess compliance with the content and format requirements. Initial observations from the Committee have identified examples of relationship summaries that may lack certain disclosures or could be clearer or otherwise improved. The … Continued

Proposed Amendment to 13F – What This Really Means?

The SEC released a proposed amendment to Form 13F on July 10 to update the reporting threshold for institutional investment managers and make other targeted changes. The threshold has not been adjusted since the Commission adopted Form 13F over 40 years ago. New Proposed Reporting Threshold: The proposal would raise the reporting threshold to $3.5 … Continued