Mitigating the Risk of Insider Trading

One of the biggest risks affecting investment advisers is the potential that material non-public information (“MNPI”) may be misused, leading to a charge of insider trading. Advisers should implement controls to mitigate these risks.

Steven Stone of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Salvatore Cincinelli of the FBI and David Chaves of Tone at the Top Advisers, addressed the risks of insider trading at the recent Ascendant Compliance Solutions Strategies Spring 2019 Conference held in Miami Beach. During the session, the panel discussed the legal backdrop of the insider trading laws and process of conducting investigations, all of which inform the process of mitigating the risks.

Chaves and Cincinelli noted that insider trading investigations can go on for years, but improvements to data analytics and knowledge of the process significantly improve the chances that someone trading on inside information will be caught. Federal investigators have also built closer relationships with regulators and routinely embed agents with the SEC and other regulators.

The panel offered the following tips for investment advisers to guard against insider trading risks:

  • Ensure that you have good policies and procedures in place
  • Conduct training with respect to identifying and handling potential MNPI
  • Consider developing information barriers to limit the possession of MNPI within the firm
  • Review trading activity and identify profitable trades, in both client and personal accounts
  • Identify any trends in trading activity against subsequent news releases or other suspicious patterns
  • Review policies with respect to the use of expert networks, using only networks with strong compliance controls

CSS TradeSentry streamlines identification of market abuse, insider dealing detection, and best execution, making it an ideal tool for addressing SEC Rule 206(4)-7 and the EU Market Abuse Regulation. For more information, click here.


Subscribe to CSS Blog

CSS frequently publishes blog posts which are written by our team from their observations in the field, at conferences and through experiences with compliance professionals. These posts are designed to further knowledge and share industry best practices. Topics run the gamut, including Form ADV, cybersecurity, MiFID II, position limit monitoring, technology challenges and more. Complete and submit the brief form below to receive notifications when we publish new content.

Loading form...

Latest Content

How Can a Small Advisory Practice Economically Be as Cyber-Secure as Possible?

Cybersecurity is a risk that applies to firms both large and small without discrimination. Even very small advisory firms, which I’ll define as having one to five staff for purposes of this discussion, have a wealth of information worth safeguarding. Cybercrime is often a crime of opportunity. Hackers are metaphorically going door to door (computer … Continued

Will We See Liquidity Risk Management Programs in Europe Soon?

In an article posted by Ignites Europe, the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) in Luxembourg declared that it has “stepped up its supervisory focus on the liquidity aspects that are related to the recent developments” of Neil Woodford’s flagship fund and H2O Asset Management, an affiliate of Natixis Asset Management. In the U.S., … Continued