Mitigating the Risk of Insider Trading

One of the biggest risks affecting investment advisers is the potential that material non-public information (“MNPI”) may be misused, leading to a charge of insider trading. Advisers should implement controls to mitigate these risks.

Steven Stone of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Salvatore Cincinelli of the FBI and David Chaves of Tone at the Top Advisers, addressed the risks of insider trading at the recent Ascendant Compliance Solutions Strategies Spring 2019 Conference held in Miami Beach. During the session, the panel discussed the legal backdrop of the insider trading laws and process of conducting investigations, all of which inform the process of mitigating the risks.

Chaves and Cincinelli noted that insider trading investigations can go on for years, but improvements to data analytics and knowledge of the process significantly improve the chances that someone trading on inside information will be caught. Federal investigators have also built closer relationships with regulators and routinely embed agents with the SEC and other regulators.

The panel offered the following tips for investment advisers to guard against insider trading risks:

  • Ensure that you have good policies and procedures in place
  • Conduct training with respect to identifying and handling potential MNPI
  • Consider developing information barriers to limit the possession of MNPI within the firm
  • Review trading activity and identify profitable trades, in both client and personal accounts
  • Identify any trends in trading activity against subsequent news releases or other suspicious patterns
  • Review policies with respect to the use of expert networks, using only networks with strong compliance controls

CSS TradeSentry streamlines identification of market abuse, insider dealing detection, and best execution, making it an ideal tool for addressing SEC Rule 206(4)-7 and the EU Market Abuse Regulation. For more information, click here.

Latest Content

Don’t Forget the Disclosure Obligation

Recently, the SEC announced the settlement of an enforcement case against Morgan Stanley Smith Barney (MSSB) involving charges that MSSB provided misleading information to its clients in connection with trading costs in its retail wrap fee programs. MSSB agreed to pay a $5 million penalty that will be distributed to harmed investors. The case is … Continued

Time to Hit the Form CRS Panic Button?

Don’t panic, CSS’s “Time to Hit the Form CRS Panic Button” ComplianceCast webinar, recorded on May 28 at 2:00 pm EDT will help you meet the deadline quickly and efficiently and answer any last minute questions you have. The Form CRS Automator will create a Form CRS that meets regulatory requirements without having to complete … Continued

CME Group to Wind Down European and Australian Repositories

Following an evaluation made by the CME Group, they have come to the decision to wind down the Abide Financial, NEX Regulatory Reporting businesses and their European and Australian Trade Repositories (TR). As CME/NEX Abide is shutting down their TR business, all CME/NEX Abide clients must now select and perform portability to a new Trade … Continued