NFA CPOs/CTAs, Beware Late Filing Penalties

For firms registered with the National Futures Association (NFA) as commodity pool operators (CPOs) or commodity trading advisors (CTAs) and are required to file NFA Form PQR or PR, you better start getting those filings in on time! The self-regulatory organization recently amended its Compliance Rule 2-46 to impose a $200 late fee for each business day that members are late with their filings. This late fee will become effective for all such filings starting on September 30, 2016.

The NFA uses the information contained in these filings made by CPOs and CTAs by integrating them into its risk management system.  This information assists the organization in determining which member firms to examine, and helps in identifying firms that warrant additional monitoring. However, the NFA has historically experienced problems with firms submitting late filings of Forms PQR or PR, despite stepping up efforts to follow-up with those late filers.

Starting on September 30, for Form PQR, the late fee will apply to the CPO entity and will not be assessed on each pool operated by the CPO that has a late filing. The idea is of course to reduce the number of late filers, and to impose the same practice the NFA currently adheres to with respect to late financial filings made by futures commission merchants, Forex dealers and introducing broker members.  Additionally, the organization indicated that the imposition of late fees will not preclude the NFA from taking disciplinary action against firms under NFA’s Compliance Rules for failure to comply with the filing deadlines – a very clear message that NFA is taking the issue of late filers quite seriously.

More information on this amendment to the rules can be found in the organization’s May 31, 2016 Submission Letter to the CFTC.

If you have questions about your Form PQR or PR filings, please call us at 860-435-2255 or email info@ascendantcompliance.com for more information.


Subscribe to CSS Blog

CSS frequently publishes blog posts which are written by our team from their observations in the field, at conferences and through experiences with compliance professionals. These posts are designed to further knowledge and share industry best practices. Topics run the gamut, including Form ADV, cybersecurity, MiFID II, position limit monitoring, technology challenges and more. Complete and submit the brief form below to receive notifications when we publish new content.

Latest Content

Texas Outlaws and a Silver Bullet: Position Limits in the USA

In this first installment on position limits, Regulatory Guidance expert Greg Hotaling surveys the current landscape of position limits imposed for U.S.-listed commodity derivative holdings, which can affect investment firms and other speculative investors regardless of where they are based. Stay tuned for coverage of EU position limits in the next edition. “Who shot J.R.?!” … Continued

FAQs From the Cyber Desk

Cybersecurity is a fast-moving target, so it is not uncommon for firms to have questions when it comes to assessing and understanding their cybersecurity risks. Here at CSS we receive a lot of cybersecurity questions, so we thought we would take the time to answer 10 of the most common Frequently Asked Questions. (1) What … Continued

EU Position Limits: Born in the USA?

This is the second installment of Regulatory Guidance Expert Greg Hotaling’s blog on position limits, this time addressing EU-listed commodity derivatives and related products.  As always, keep in mind that these limits can apply to asset managers, and other market participants, regardless of where they are based. In 2009, the European Union’s first comprehensive position … Continued