Placing Ethics and Compliance in the Foreground of Business Decision-Making

Thinking about how to make ethics and compliance part of a business’s decision-making can prove to be challenging. By nature, compliance professionals are often results-oriented, focusing on a binary end-result; either you are in compliance, or you are not. That focus is important, but emphasizing process is also vital, John Walsh, Partner at Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, told attendees at the recent CSS/Ascendant conference in San Diego.

Walsh speaking at “Decrypting Regulations: Cracking the Code to Powerful Compliance Programs”

In his keynote presentation, Walsh, a 23-year veteran of the SEC, addressed the topic of behavioral ethics and its importance to the compliance industry. A longtime advocate of ethics, Walsh has written many scholarly articles and presented to many audiences on the topic. He provided comprehensible guidance on how compliance officers can incorporate ethics into business decision-making.

Walsh discussed a behavioral survey related to ethics in compliance, which included several Thought Experiments (Case Studies) and practical guidance to use in everyday functions. The survey conducted by Tom Tyler and Jonathan Jackson, titled “Popular Legitimacy and the Exercise of Legal Authority: Motivating Compliance, Cooperation and Engagement” was published in Psychology, Public Policy and Law in August 2013. This national survey found distinctions between Compliance, Cooperation and Engagement.

The categories were defined as follows:

  • Compliers – People who do not violate the rules because they feel an obligation to obey them
  • Cooperators – People who actively and voluntarily cooperate with authorities because they understand the deeper context of the rules
  • Engaged – People who identify with the shared goals and values of rules in a way that drives them to proactively help develop a viable community that polices itself

Mr. Walsh went on to correlate the study to the compliance industry, explaining that by categorizing people in this way, compliance professionals can then begin to leverage specific communication methods for the promotion of ethics and compliance into business decision-making.

How do you do this? Walsh indicated that you must first recognize your audience as either compliers, cooperators, or engaged. Then build your legitimacy as an ethics and compliance authority with each of these groups; you do this by being perceived as fair. You can demonstrate fairness through neutrality and sincerity, and whether you respect their dignity and give them an opportunity to explain. When you are able to consider all internal and external stakeholders, and assess if there are any stress-induced cognitive biases that you can leverage, you will be better armed to effectively campaign for ethics and compliance.


Subscribe to CSS Blog

CSS frequently publishes blog posts which are written by our team from their observations in the field, at conferences and through experiences with compliance professionals. These posts are designed to further knowledge and share industry best practices. Topics run the gamut, including Form ADV, cybersecurity, MiFID II, position limit monitoring, technology challenges and more. Complete and submit the brief form below to receive notifications when we publish new content.

Loading form...

Latest Content

Giving Voice to Values: A New Approach to Ethics

The “Giving Voice to Values” program grew out of Professor Mary Gentile’s frustration of what was going on in both the financial industry and in higher education. She was frustrated and angry about the poor way that ethics was being taught in universities and applied in real-world scenarios. What developed out of her frustration is … Continued

Tips for Developing a Tailored Private Fund Compliance Calendar

As regulatory concerns proliferate and become more complex, developing and monitoring your “to-do” list becomes of paramount importance.  John Gentile, the Director of Private Fund Manager Services for Compliance Solutions Strategies and Michael Emanuel, a Partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP provided attendees of the recent CSS 2019 Fall Conference some insight into … Continued

Brexit: Implications for Shareholders with Threshold Interests

As yet another deadline approaches for the United Kingdom to either leave the European Union with a withdrawal agreement in place or else exit effective immediately in a “no-deal” scenario, it is worth examining how this would affect asset managers subject to the UK regimes for major shareholdings, short selling, and dealing disclosures. First, the … Continued