Planning for the Annual Review and Reporting

Rule 206(4)-7 of the Advisers Act and Rule 38a-1 of the Investment Company Act require an Investment Adviser and a Fund, respectively, to review policies and procedures annually to determine their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation.

The SEC highlights specific focus areas including portfolio management processes, trading practices, proprietary trading, disclosure accuracy, and records maintenance, among other things.

In 2006, then-OCIE Associate Director for Examinations Gene Gohlke listed nine questions that SEC examiners consider in scrutinizing an annual review. Those questions still resonate today and can inform your process.

They include:

  1. Who conducted the review?
  2. What was reviewed?
  3. When was it conducted?
  4. How was it conducted?
  5. What were the findings from the review work?
  6. What recommendations were made?
  7. What is the current status of implement recommendations?
  8. What documentation was created/retained to reflect the work done?
  9. What was the involvement of senior management in the review?

To be blunt, the process should be a team effort, with different departments “owning” their subject matters. Doing so allows the CCO to keep compliance on the radar for firm employees and sets the “culture of compliance” that the SEC looks for. It cannot be stressed enough that involving management and employees outside the compliance department sets a tone firm-wide.

In our recent ComplianceCast, “Planning the Annual Review and Reporting,” consultants Allison Fraser and David Lourie go in-depth on the complex topic.

Learning objectives include:

  • Planning and Documentation
  • Testing the Adequacy and Effectiveness of Policies and Procedures
  • Reporting Annual Review Findings
  • Responding to Issues Identified by the Annual Review
  • Common Deficiencies

To download this ComplianceCast presentation, please fill out our request form by clicking here.


Subscribe to CSS Blog

CSS frequently publishes blog posts which are written by our team from their observations in the field, at conferences and through experiences with compliance professionals. These posts are designed to further knowledge and share industry best practices. Topics run the gamut, including Form ADV, cybersecurity, MiFID II, position limit monitoring, technology challenges and more. Complete and submit the brief form below to receive notifications when we publish new content.

Latest Content

Texas Outlaws and a Silver Bullet: Position Limits in the USA

In this first installment on position limits, Regulatory Guidance expert Greg Hotaling surveys the current landscape of position limits imposed for U.S.-listed commodity derivative holdings, which can affect investment firms and other speculative investors regardless of where they are based. Stay tuned for coverage of EU position limits in the next edition. “Who shot J.R.?!” … Continued

FAQs From the Cyber Desk

Cybersecurity is a fast-moving target, so it is not uncommon for firms to have questions when it comes to assessing and understanding their cybersecurity risks. Here at CSS we receive a lot of cybersecurity questions, so we thought we would take the time to answer 10 of the most common Frequently Asked Questions. (1) What … Continued

EU Position Limits: Born in the USA?

This is the second installment of Regulatory Guidance Expert Greg Hotaling’s blog on position limits, this time addressing EU-listed commodity derivatives and related products.  As always, keep in mind that these limits can apply to asset managers, and other market participants, regardless of where they are based. In 2009, the European Union’s first comprehensive position … Continued