SEC Proposes Amending Investment Company Liquidity Disclosures in Forms N-PORT and N-1A

On March 14, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) proposed amendments to the mutual fund liquidity-related disclosure requirements.

Specifically, the proposal:

  1. Adds a new requirement to “briefly discuss the operation and effectiveness of the Fund’s liquidity risk management program during the most recently completed fiscal year” in the Fund’s Management Discussion of Fund Performance (“MDFP”) as part of its annual shareholder report. This discussion would replace the Form N-PORT requirement to report aggregate liquidity classification information (i.e. the totals in each liquidity bucket) which is released to the public the third month of each quarter.In considering these changes from Form N-PORT to the shareholder annual report, the SEC is responding to public comments in which concerns were raised that disclosing liquidity risk information in Form N-PORT would confuse investors because of the subjectivity of the classification process, the lack of context surrounding the classification process and that such disclosure highlights liquidity risk in isolation from other risks.
  2. Amends form N-PORT to allow a single security to be classified in more than one liquidity bucket. This is especially useful for funds in which different subadvisers may reach different liquidity conclusions with respect to a security. The flexibility also gives funds additional options for classifying securities across buckets to reflect variances in liquidity based on the size of a particular holding (the “proportionality approach”). The SEC recently published FAQs permitting funds to classify a security in more than one bucket, but the fund could only report one bucket in Form N-PORT. Now, the fund can follow the bucketing of its liquidity risk management program.
  3. Adds a new requirement to Form N-PORT for a fund to report its holdings of cash and cash equivalents. Under the current requirements, cash and cash equivalents are included in the aggregate liquidity classification that the proposal would eliminate. By requiring the reporting of cash and cash equivalents, Form N-PORT would then have a complete accounting of a fund’s holdings.

In our view, these proposed changes will provide funds with additional flexibility to more accurately classify the liquidity of specific holdings and provide for a more meaningful discussion of a fund’s liquidity risk. By moving to a narrative discussion in the annual shareholder report, the goal of improving information disclosure regarding a fund’s liquidity risk profile can be more effectively met, while ensuring that liquidity risks are discussed in the appropriate context of other fund risks. Further, the annual shareholder report is an existing communication currently available to all shareholders.

There is a 60-day comment period before the proposal appears before the Commission for a final vote. We will keep you posted as developments unfold.


NOTE: This post was originally published on Ascendant’s parent company site, Compliance Solutions Strategies. CSS is a global RegTech platform delivering a set of comprehensive and complementary technology-enabled regulatory solutions that serve compliance professionals across the financial services industry. For more information, visit ComplianceSolutionsStrategies.com.


Subscribe to CSS Blog

CSS frequently publishes blog posts which are written by our team from their observations in the field, at conferences and through experiences with compliance professionals. These posts are designed to further knowledge and share industry best practices. Topics run the gamut, including Form ADV, cybersecurity, MiFID II, position limit monitoring, technology challenges and more. Complete and submit the brief form below to receive notifications when we publish new content.

Latest Content

Breakdown of OCIE’s COVID-19 Compliance Risks Alert

The SEC’s “Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (“OCIE”) issued an Alert today regarding “Select COVID-19 Compliance Risks for Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers.” OCIE shared observations regarding six broad categories: protection of investors’ assets; supervision of personnel; practices relating to fees, expenses, and financial transactions; investment fraud; business continuity; and the protection of investor and … Continued

Are Investment Managers Going to Have More KIDs?

Let us be clear…. we’re actually talking about the potential increase in production of point-of-investment disclosure documents for investment managers. The complications and stress of Brexit just got a whole lot more real for many UK- and EU-based investment management companies that are subject to rules requiring production of UCITS KIID (Key-Investor-Information-Document) and PRIIPs KID … Continued

Do You Feel Confident Your Password Hasn’t Been Hacked?

As a cybersecurity consultant, I am often asked if some of the threats we industry practitioners talk about are overstated. Hyped up fear as a sales tactic. The simple answer is no. The fear is not overstated, and the risks all too real – which helps to explain why cyber remains a top priority for … Continued