Shareholder Monitoring and Disclosures: Keeping One Step Ahead of the Front Office

Fresh from our London conference “Looking at the Year Ahead – Global Compliance and Data Priorities” – a rousing success! – we’ll cover takeaways from a key panel discussion on shareholder monitoring and disclosures.

Two of the best in the business were in the house (or should we say “in the brewery,” an amazing London venue that dates back to 1750): Darren Fox, Partner at Simmons & Simmons, and my colleague Mike Marmo, Product Manager at CSS. Together, they paired as a complementary set of experts from the legal and data sides, respectively. So let’s explore the areas they covered, and here we’ll also reveal what they saw as the top pain points – as well as some unexpected ones – faced by asset managers.

JOIN US: Sign up for our upcoming Roundtables on Global Threshold Monitoring in Amsterdam, Dublin or London. Click for more info!

For the uninitiated, we can quickly define the topic discussed: Shareholder filing obligations are imposed by local regulators when reaching certain ownership percentages in issuers (often starting as low as 1-3 percent) or short positions in issuers (as low as 0.01%) based in those local jurisdictions. Additional filing requirements often apply if the issuer is involved in a takeover bid, does business in a certain protected industry, or chooses to impose its own additional filing thresholds.

Shareholder disclosure affects most or virtually all of the asset management industry, as a big show of hands in the room confirmed. The biggest challenge? The attendees from the industry were more split on this point, but a top concern was keeping up with the various local regulations across the world. The point was addressed with invaluable detail from Darren Fox who, among his several roles at Simmons & Simmons, heads up Navigator, the global law firm’s regulatory database of shareholder disclosure rules.  He stressed that investment managers, which are among his clients that may trade in securities across several dozen jurisdictions at any one time, are served well by (1) closely monitoring regulatory news developments around the world, and (2) engaging a partner – be it a compliance consultant, a platform for monitoring holdings, a law firm or otherwise – with global experience and expertise in shareholder disclosure matters.

Top pain point: Aggregation of holdings across affiliates
Surprise pain point: Position limits (maximum number of contracts you can hold in certain categories of derivative products)

Having the right reporting data was another major concern expressed. This was confirmed by Mike Marmo, whose experience as product head of CSS shareholder reporting platform Signal brought several thorny issues to light. These include identifying the relevant issuers (especially where dual- or cross-listed) and calculating holdings (with derivatives and delta calculations complicating matters). He added that properly sourcing third-party reference data – be it takeover panel lists published by regulators, registries maintained by ESMA or other databases – is a key to conquering the challenge.

Top pain point: Issuer shares outstanding data
Surprise pain point: ETF/index holdings

The discussion shifted back to Darren for yet another challenge: how to submit the filings once your holdings have reached a threshold in a particular issuer. While having to adhere to tight filing deadlines (as little as one day in some cases), a shareholder’s tasks such as navigating submission portals and handling local language requirements are common sources of frustration. As Darren and others noted, such obstacles can cause unexpected delays in filing, and therefore should be squarely addressed by investment managers well before reaching a filing threshold.

Top pain point: Which party notifies? Fund, manager, parent, appointee, etc.
Surprise pain point: Accurately transferring your data to the disclosure form

Thanks for reading. To learn more about our position limit monitoring and shareholding disclosure solution, visit our Signal page, and for more in-depth information on the topic consider joining us for our next compliance conference, held in Miami from April 15-17!

Subscribe to CSS Blog

CSS frequently publishes blog posts which are written by our team from their observations in the field, at conferences and through experiences with compliance professionals. These posts are designed to further knowledge and share industry best practices. Topics run the gamut, including Form ADV, cybersecurity, MiFID II, position limit monitoring, technology challenges and more. Complete and submit the brief form below to receive notifications when we publish new content.

Related Content

Regulatory Changes to Sensitive Industries

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting market volatility have led several governments to amend law and regulation in the context of sensitive industries (SI). SI refers to two distinct types of investment restrictions: 1) foreign direct investment (FDI) restrictions, often part of national security screenings of incoming foreign capital and 2) sector-specific … Continued

Global Short Selling Restrictions in a COVID-19 Economy

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting lockdown of Wuhan, China on 23 January 2020, world markets have seen unprecedented swings, developed and developing countries alike have experienced severe economic damage, and regulators around the world have taken swift and significant actions in attempts to stave off further financial turmoil. For investment … Continued

Shareholder Disclosure: Low Notification Thresholds in Europe

Among the hundreds of threshold reporting rules throughout Europe that affect investment managers, a significant number apply to long or short positions of 1% or lower. And because the applicable rules are the local laws of wherever the issuer is based or listed, a market participant with exposure in various European issuers could be subject … Continued

Shareholder Disclosure: Long Holdings in Europe

Investment managers are subject to hundreds of threshold reporting rules throughout Europe, for long holdings, short selling, and dealing disclosures. The reason: applicable rules are the local laws of wherever the issuer is based or listed (and Europe is still far from fully harmonizing them). This map illustrates what the long position holder may face … Continued

Suggestions on Global Threshold Monitoring

On the heels of several European events focused on shareholder and position limit monitoring, we shifted to Miami, Florida and the Ascendant Compliance Solutions Strategies 2019 Spring Conference for another engaging session on the subject.

Latest Content

From One CCO to Another: Don’t Lie to the SEC

Every once in a while, I think it’s important to get back to the basics. Since the adoption of the compliance rules in 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff has repeatedly stated that the intent of the rules were not to hunt CCOs. Great pains have been made to enlist CCOs support in ensuring … Continued

BME Partners with CSS to Strengthen its Regulatory Service Suite

BME to offer financial services firms in Spain and Portugal a multi-regulation reporting platform Partnership brings a unique combination of local market presence and global coverage BME has partnered with Compliance Solutions Strategies (CSS), a leading RegTech platform provider, to offer a global regulatory reporting solution in Spain and Portugal. The combination of BME’s local … Continued

Compliance Solutions Strategies Acquires AMFINE

Combination Creates First Fully End-To-End Compliance Reporting Platform NEW YORK, September 10, 2020 – Compliance Solutions Strategies (“CSS”), a leading RegTech platform providing technology-driven solutions which enable financial services firms to meet mandatory regulatory compliance requirements, today announced the acquisition of AMFINE (“AMFINE”), a provider of SaaS-based regulatory reporting services to European asset managers, asset … Continued